The Morgan Doctrine: #MyDinnerWithTrump: The 2016 TIME Person of the Year Will Release Hillary's Hacked Emails

Monday, July 25, 2016

#MyDinnerWithTrump: The 2016 TIME Person of the Year Will Release Hillary's Hacked Emails

You just know that one of the above three national leaders have archived Hillary Clinton's emails. Here's my unapologetic attempt to win a dinner with Donald Trump, and personally give him a copy of my novel Daddy's Little Felons (a fictional account of how cyber privateering could become the next big growth industry and turn cyber security into a profit center for the U.S. Treasury Department). Not only could this posting win me a coveted dinner with Donald J. Trump, but it could actually get him elected POTUS. Because one of the above three leaders— Bibi Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, or Kim Jung Un—could put him over the top by revealing the foreign governments had full access to Hillary Clinton's private email servers during her time as the U.S. Secretary of State.

And even if I don't win a dinner with Mr. Trump, I strongly advise his campaign to reach out to the above three leaders and…work a deal. It doesn't even have to be a secret deal. In fact, it shouldn't. Unlike the Iranian nuclear deal, which had secret components, the Hillary Email Deal should be completely public and above board. No secrets. Complete transparency.

Sure, foreign governments aren't allowed to make cash political contributions to U.S. presidential elections. But what's to keep them from casting a strong vote in the 2016 election for POTUS? A public vote, unless…

Okay, as the campaign nears completion and we get close to November, I can see why Israel or Russia might not want to release the emails if Hillary Clinton has an overwhelming lead in the polls. Those emails would be a much better private bargaining chip to use with President Hillary. And who knows just how many points release of the emails would gain Donald Trump. In that case, I propose…

…A False Flag Operation. Give the emails to Kim Jung Un of North Korea, and let him take the heat. You know he would relish the thought of making national headlines. In fact, his advocates in China might just consider giving him their copies of the emails. Sooner than later.

If I were a betting man, I'd put my money on Bibi and Israel. Reason? They're fighting for their very existence, and the Iran nuclear deal puts that existence at risk.

Heck, if one of the above governments would send them to me, I'D RELEASE THEM IF DONALD TRUMP WOULD GUARANTEE IN ADVANCE AND PUBLICLY TO PARDON ME.

What's YOUR bet? Comment below.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Implementation suggestions for THE MORGAN DOCTRINE are most welcome. What are the "Got'chas!"? What questions would some future Cyber Privateering Czar have to answer about this in a Senate confirmation hearing?

Background: Welcome black hats, white hats and cyber swashbucklers

The Revolutionary War was fought, financed, and pretty well WON by bonded privateers, legalized pirates who were given Letters of Marque and Reprisal by the Continental Congress and authorized to attack, capture and monetize British ships. The purpose of this site is to explore the possibility of a modern-day doctrine much like the Monroe Doctrine, by means of which the U.S. government could legally and, more importantly, effectively stop international hackers. Current cybercrime law is not only ineffective, but downright stupid. My Linux servers are attacked hundreds of times a day (mostly from China and former USSR domains), yet if I retaliate against those servers with some creative technology at my disposal (I know some VERY smart guys), then I am in violation of federal law and subject to some onerous penalties. We need more than a new law. We need a new international doctrine. I call it The Morgan Doctrine, named after Morgan Rapier, a fictional character I've created (hey, this is my way of establishing ownership of the concept, should it ever see the light of day).

Why a new international doctrine? Simply, nothing else will work. Introduced on December 2, 1823, the Monroe Doctrine told the world to keep their hands off the Americas. Combine this with current legal thinking on "hot pursuit" of fugitives. In 1917 the US Army went into Mexico after Pancho Villa. More recently, in 1960 Israeli Mossad agents abducted Adolf Eichmann from Argentina. Granted, much of the world regards the Eichmann adventure as a violation of international law. I don't share that opinion and therefore use it as the third leg of my Monroe-Pancho-Aldof platform for The Morgan Doctrine.

If someone comes into your home and attacks or attempts to rob you, you may shoot them dead. You may do so as long as they expire on your property. But what about cyber criminals? They attack you in your home from their homes. Retaliate in kind, and you go to jail. The Morgan Doctrine states simply that if you attack my computers (or my banking assets held in US-based computers), then under a certain set of well-defined conditions, a licensed and bonded "cyber privateer" may attack you in your home country and split the proceeds with the U.S. government. For the sake of argument, let's call it a 50-50 split (heh heh).

Right now, American law enforcement is completely unequipped to deal with the sheer number international cyber hackers. Sure, I could report each of the thousand daily attacks to the FBI, as could the millions of other attackees in the USA. But the volume of such reports would make any meaningful resolution laughable. Not to mention that the FBI has no jurisdiction outside the USA. Yet to make such "enforcement" profitable to recognized (ie, "bonded" "deputized") privateers, as Heath Ledger's Joker said in his last role, "Now you're talking!" You raid our bank accounts, we raid yours. You make money from off-shore child pornography, we're going to loot your bank accounts and, with some REALLY creative black hat operations, you will be taken off the grid worldwide to the extent that you'll not even complete a cell phone conversation for the remainder of your miserable depraved life. Okay, that last part probably won't fly, but you get my drift.

The purpose of this site is to explore the mechanics, legalities and practicality of The Morgan Doctrine.

And I will be the sole arbiter of whether or not your comments get posted. As Mel Brooks wrote, "It's good to be king."